This section is a summary of the major flexible pavement mat problems. It is organized by visual appearance. Each visual mat problem category contains (1) a description of the problem with pictures if available, (2) a discussion of the problem's nature, (3) possible causes and (4) possible solutions to eliminate the problem. The section is organized alphabetically and the pictures are not included in the Module list of figures. For larger views of the pictures, click on the thumbnails. An in-depth treatment of mat problems and defects can be found in:
This section is taken largely from the Hot-Mix Asphalt Paving Handbook 2000, Section 19.
| Index of Mat Problems Shown on this Page | ||||
|
Fat Spots |
Shoving |
|||
|
Description: Isolated areas in the mat where excess asphalt binder is visible on the surface. Problem: A few scattered fat spots may not significantly affect mat durability or pavement structure. A large number of fat spots may affect:
Possible Causes: Causes can be related to HMA moisture, petroleum/diesel contamination or construction:
Solutions: Solutions differ depending upon the cause:
|
||
|
Description: Bumps, elevation differences, a lack of mix or low density near or in a transverse or longitudinal joint. Problem: Typically, poor transverse joints result in a slight bump, which can affect roughness. Poor longitudinal joints are generally lower in density, may fail prematurely from raveling or cracking, and may allow water infiltration into the base and subgrade. Possible Causes: Poor construction, inadequate compaction or poor startup procedures.
Solutions: Use acceptable joint construction practices:
|
||
|
Description: Short transverse cracks usually 25 - 75 mm (1 - 3 inches) long and 25 - 75 mm (1 - 3 inches) apart that appear on the mat surface during compaction. Problem: By itself, microcracking is only a small detriment to pavement performance; the cracks are usually quite shallow and small. However, microcracking can indicate mix tenderness, which can eventually lead to inadequate compaction either because (1) the mixture shoves rather than compacts under roller loads or (2) in an effort to avoid checking rollers are left off the mat so long that they are not able to complete compaction before cessation temperature is reached. Therefore, microcracking can be an indirect indication of inadequate compaction. Inadequately compacted areas have higher air voids and are susceptible to decreased stiffness, reduced fatigue life, accelerated aging/decreased durability, rutting, raveling, and moisture damage (Hughes, 1984; Hughes, 1989). Microcracking can also be an indication of compaction of a cool mat. If a mat is too cool, the applied compactive effort may cause the surface to fracture. Possible Causes: There are two principal causes of microcracking:
Solutions: Solutions differ depending upon the cause:
|
|||
|
Open texture during construction |
Excessive handwork |
||
|
Description: Differences in appearance within the mat surface. Extreme differences in mat surface appearance often take on the look of tearing or streaking and should be investigated as such. Typically, mat areas that look rougher and more coarse than other areas are of the greatest concern. HMA mixtures with larger nominal maximum aggregate sizes will naturally appear more coarse on the mat surface than mixtures with smaller nominal maximum aggregate sizes. Problem: In and of itself, a rough surface texture is not necessarily detrimental to pavement performance. Rough surface areas are, however, undesirable in parking lots and other areas of high pedestrian traffic. Furthermore, rough areas can be an indication of low density, aggregate segregation or temperature differentials, which can all substantially reduce pavement life. Possible Causes: There are many potential causes for non-uniform mat texture. Many times, the same mechanisms can cause mat tearing and non-uniform texture. Therefore, an investigation of mat tearing causes is also warranted. The following lists causes that are separate from mat tearing causes:
Solutions: Solutions differ depending
upon the cause. Typical solutions involve minimizing handwork,
delivering the HMA at a high enough temperature to allow for proper
compaction, properly preparing base courses and subgrades and taking steps
to eliminate segregation and temperature differentials. |
|||
|
Roller parked on a hot mat |
Marks from stopping too fast |
||
|
Description: Indentations that remain in the mat surface after rolling operations are complete. Most roller marks are removed from the mat surface by finish rolling. Problem: Roller marks may cause an increase in roughness, but by themselves they are not particularly damaging to pavement performance. Roller marks are, however, an indication of inadequate compaction and/or a tender mix. Possible Causes: Causes can be related to compaction, tender mixes or roller operation:
Solutions: Solutions differ depending upon the cause:
|
|||
|
Description: Displacement of the HMA mixture in a longitudinal direction while compacting. Shoving under traffic loading is covered in Module 9.7, Flexible Pavement Distress. Problem: Mats that shove under compaction loading are generally unstable and are likely to continue to deform under traffic loading leading to roughness problems. If a mat is not adequately compacted because it is shoving, the resulting low density can cause the mat to be susceptible to decreased stiffness, reduced fatigue life, accelerated aging/decreased durability, rutting, raveling, and moisture damage (Hughes, 1984; Hughes, 1989). Possible Causes: Tender mixes. Solutions: Eliminate the causes for
tender mixes or develop a compaction sequence and pattern to accommodate the
tender mix. Compaction sequence and patterns will depend upon the type
of mix tenderness (high
temperature, mid-range
temperature). |
|
Description: Surface waves can appear in several different forms:
Problem: All surface waves will cause an increase in roughness. The pavement's structural capacity is only affected if the waves are severe enough to cause vehicles to bounce significantly as the traverse the waves. This would increase impact loading and thus increase the overall loading to which the pavement is subjected. Possible Causes: Causes can be roughly categorized by the type of surface wave:
Solutions: Surface waves can only be eliminated by preventing their formation.
|
|
|
Centerline streak |
Infrared view of centerline streak |
||
|
Description: Mat tearing, or streaks in the mat, can be caused by different phenomena:
Problem: Torn mat areas are unsightly and can reduce long-term pavement performance. Mat tearing usually results in a corresponding decrease in density relative to the mat as a whole. Therefore, torn or streaked areas may have higher air voids and are susceptible to decreased stiffness, reduced fatigue life, accelerated aging/decreased durability, rutting, raveling, and moisture damage (Hughes, 1984; Hughes, 1989). Possible Causes: Causes depend upon the type of mat tearing or streaking:
Solutions: Solutions depend upon the type of tearing or streaking:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
Description: Transverse indentations in the mat surface across the width of the mat. These indentations occur when the paver stops between truckloads of HMA and the screed rests on the hot mat. Problem: Generally, transverse screed marks will not affect a pavement's structure but they will affect roughness. Possible Causes: Causes can be related to either the paver or the HMA mixture:
Solutions: Solutions differ depending upon the cause:
|
||