| Major Topics on this Page | |
| Definitions and Terms | |
| Construction Problems | |
| Construction Solutions | |
| Best Practices |
A longitudinal joint is the interface between two adjacent and parallel HMA mats. Improperly constructed longitudinal joints can cause premature deterioration of multilane HMA pavements in the form of cracking and raveling (see Figures 1 and 2). These distresses, caused by relatively low density (high air voids) and surface irregularity at the joints, can largely be avoided through proper construction techniques and equipment. This section is taken largely from three National Center for Asphalt Technology (NCAT) reports:
Kandhal, P.S. and Mallick, R.B. (1996). A Study of Longitudinal Joint Construction Techniques in HMA Pavements (Interim Report - Colorado Project). NCAT Report No. 96-03. http://www.eng.auburn.edu/center/ncat/reports/rep96-3.pdf
Kandhal, P.S. and Mallick, R.B. (1997). Longitudinal Joint Construction Techniques for Asphalt Pavements. NCAT Report No. 97-04. http://www.eng.auburn.edu/center/ncat/reports/rep97-4.pdf
![]() |
![]() |
| Figure 1: Longitudinal Joint Showing Good Performance (No Cracks or Raveling) | Figure 2: Longitudinal Joint Showing Poor Performance (Notice the Jagged Crack) |
This section uses the following terms when referring to longitudinal joints (see Figure 3):
Figure 3: Longitudinal Joint Terms
If no construction precautions are taken, the longitudinal joint of a multi-lane paving project will often be significantly less dense than the majority of the pavement and contain surface irregularities that may or may not be caused by segregation.
Low density is general HMA problem that can lead to numerous distresses including decreased stiffness, reduced fatigue life, accelerated aging/decreased durability, rutting, raveling, and moisture damage (Hughes, 1984; Hughes, 1989). Keep in mind that "low density" and "high air voids" refer to the same thing.
Usually a well-constructed joint will be about 1 - 2 percent less dense than the rest of the lane away from the joint, however a poorly constructed joint can have significantly lower density - on the order of 5 - 10 percent (Kandhal and Mallick, 1996). Low joint density is common since the edge of the lane first paved (cold lane) is unconfined. As the roller passes over, this unconfined edge tends to deform laterally rather than compact. The subsequent lane (hot lane) is confined by the cold lane and therefore tends to be more dense. Typically, the hot side of the joint is about 2 - 4 more dense than the cold side (Kandhal and Mallick, 1996). Furthermore, the overall joint does not typically meet minimum density requirements established for the mat as a whole. Many agencies that specify minimum densities (maximum air void contents) for HMA construction specifically exclude joint areas because of this.
Longitudinal joint densities that are slightly less than the mat average (on the order of 1 - 2 percent) are generally acceptable because, if properly placed, longitudinal joints with these densities (usually about 91 or 92 percent of TMD) are usually not subject to much loading, and their air void content is not high enough to cause significant raveling. Lower densities at unconfined shoulder edges are also generally acceptable because even if they are porous enough to allow water infiltration, they are not subject to much loading and they are usually sloped towards the should, which allows an infiltrating water to quickly drain away (Brock and Skinner, no date given).
|
Figure 4: Surface Irregularities |
Longitudinal joints often look coarse, open-graded or segregated (see Figure 4). This can happen for several reasons:
The solution to good longitudinal joint construction involves several aspects of the paving operation. First, pavers can be operated in a way that either eliminates the longitudinal joint altogether or at least maximizes the likelihood of adequate material placement at the joint. Second, several different joint construction devices can be fitted onto the paver screed to assist in material placement and joint compaction. Third, several techniques are available to better prepare the cold side of the longitudinal joint to adhere to the hot side. Finally, several different roller techniques can be used to increase material compaction at the joint. The various techniques listed below have been field tested with varying degrees of success. In most cases, a combination of several different techniques is required to construct a high quality longitudinal joint. This subsection covers:
![]() |
|
|
Figure 5: Echelon Paving |
Paving solutions involve the following:
Several different devices or techniques have been used with varying degrees of success to aid in the construction of longitudinal joints. These devices, most of which are described in Kandhal et al. (2002) are:
Figure 6: Notched Wedge Joint Schematic
|
|
|
| Figure 7: Notched Wedge Joint Attachment | Figure 8: Notched Wedge Joint |
![]() |
|
|
Figure 9: Joint Maker |
Sometimes longitudinal joints can fail because the hot and cold sides fail to adequately bond with one another. There are two general techniques to increase the likelihood of bonding:
Various longitudinal joint compaction techniques have been suggested to increase density and provide the proper confinement of the outside mat edge so that it compacts rather than deforms. The key differences in rolling techniques involve the exact placement of the roller on the initial pass over or near the joint. No matter which initial pass technique is used, subsequent passes are usually done in accordance with the "rolling from the hot side" technique. Typical initial roller pass techniques are (Kandhal et al., 2002):
Figure 10: Longitudinal Joint Rolling Techniques for the First Roller Pass
The National Center for Asphalt Technology (NCAT) has participated in a number of studies aimed at determining longitudinal joint construction practices that result in long-lasting high performance joints. The following is a brief list of best practices concluded from these studies: